Skip to main content
Back to Articles

Report: Analysis of Dify.ai as an AI Application Platform

17 min read
Depth: 1
11/22/2025
Regenerate

Overview

Dify (by Dify.ai) is an open‑source, low‑/no‑code platform for building and running LLM applications—chatbots, agents, RAG systems, and multi‑step workflows. It positions itself as a production‑ready, enterprise‑grade environment that combines Backend‑as‑a‑Service with LLMOps, available both as SaaS and self‑hosted.

This report looks at:

  • What Dify actually offers (features and architecture)
  • How well it lives up to “production‑ready” and enterprise claims
  • Where it’s notably strong vs. alternatives (LangChain, LangFlow, Flowise, LlamaIndex, etc.)
  • Where users and reviewers see real limitations or friction

Along the way, several follow‑up topics are referenced via wiki‑style links, e.g. Dify vs. LangChain for enterprise AI in 2025 or Hardening Dify for enterprise AI security.

Core Positioning and Architecture

What Dify is trying to be

Dify’s own materials and independent reviews consistently describe it as:

  • An LLM app development platform with:
    • Visual workflow builder
    • Agent orchestration (ReAct, tool calling, custom tools)
    • Built‑in RAG engine and knowledge base
    • Multi‑model gateway and LLMOps features
  • Open source (Apache‑style license) with a very active GitHub project and tens of thousands of stars, plus >130k cloud apps created by mid‑2024, indicating real‑world adoption.1
  • Targeted at both developers and less‑technical teams via a drag‑and‑drop studio and prebuilt templates.2

Architecturally it uses a microservices design and can be deployed via Docker Compose for small setups or on Kubernetes (e.g., GKE/ACK) with Postgres, Redis, and Qdrant for large‑scale, production workloads.3

Key idea: Dify positions itself not as a single library but as an AI “workbench” and control plane for LLM apps—closer to “Figma for AI workflows” than to a bare SDK.4

This is the same niche explored by other low‑code/visual frameworks such as LangFlow, Flowise, CrewAI Studio, and Microsoft Copilot Studio. See Low‑code AI agent platforms in 2025.

Feature Set in Practice

Visual workflows and agents

Visual Workflow Builder

  • Dify offers a drag‑and‑drop visual workflow canvas for building multi‑step flows: input nodes, LLM nodes, RAG/knowledge retrieval, logic (branching, loops), HTTP/API calls, tool calls, etc.56
  • The interface is praised as approachable for non‑engineers while still exposing advanced features such as variable binding, loops/iterations, code nodes (Python/JS), templates, and plugin integration.7
  • Independent comparisons put Dify at or near the top for debugging experience among visual tools: per‑node duration, inputs/outputs, trace views, and clear error messages.8

Agents and tools

  • Supports ReAct‑style agents and Function Calling, with ~50+ built‑in tools (web search, DALL·E, Stable Diffusion, WolframAlpha, etc.) and custom tools via OpenAPI / Swagger / OpenAI plugin spec.910
  • Can act as an internal LLM gateway: multiple LLM providers behind a unified API with observability and governance, which enterprises use as a central AI entry point.11

Observability & evaluation

  • Deep integrations with Langfuse and LangSmith provide:
    • Tracing of agent steps and workflow spans
    • Prompt/response logging, cost, and latency
    • Model‑based evals (LLM‑as‑a‑judge) and human annotation queues
    • Dashboards for error analysis and regression testing1213
  • This is a significant differentiator vs. many GUI tools that have only minimal built‑in logging.

See also Evaluating AI agents with Langfuse + Dify.

Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG)

Dify ships with a first‑class RAG engine:

  • Visual knowledge base / “Knowledge” UI to configure document ingestion, chunking, embeddings, metadata filters, and access control.14
  • RAG pipelines can ingest local files, online docs, cloud drives, databases, web crawlers, etc. via a plugin‑based ingestion framework.1516
  • RAG is deeply integrated into workflows and agents, not bolted on: retrieval nodes, knowledge filters, metadata‑based access, and multimodal direction.1718
  • Tutorials show building a Milvus‑backed RAG document assistant in ~10 minutes and handling complex tabular/assurance data with RAG.1920

However, advanced users have documented that default relevance and RAG behavior can be insufficient for specialized domains, sometimes requiring custom retrieval components or more advanced orchestration.21

For a deeper dive on the landscape, see RAG engines: Dify vs. LangChain vs. LlamaIndex.

Multi‑model gateway

Dify acts as a multi‑model gateway / adapter:

  • Out‑of‑the‑box support for OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Azure OpenAI, Meta Llama, Mistral, and many OpenAI‑compatible APIs, plus local/OSS models.2223
  • Workflows are defined model‑agnostically, so teams can switch models in config without redesigning flows.24
  • In enterprise deployments, Dify is used as a central LLM gateway where teams route traffic to different models for cost/performance reasons and for data residency.

Enterprise & LLMOps capabilities

Key LLMOps‑style capabilities include:

  • Central API key management and abstraction over multiple providers25
  • Application‑level analytics and usage metrics
  • Integration with third‑party observability (Langfuse/LangSmith) and security plugins (e.g., Palo Alto Networks plugin for AI app security)26
  • Plugin and Knowledge Pipeline ecosystem that operationalizes context engineering from ingestion to vectorization and retrieval.27

Enterprise Readiness: Security, Compliance, Scalability, Self‑hosting

Security & access control

Dify’s enterprise messaging is heavily security‑focused:

  • Marketing explicitly states that Dify Enterprise is “designed for large enterprises and regulated industries,” with enterprise‑grade security and access controls.2829
  • Enterprise features include:
    • Multi‑tenant / multi‑workspace architecture for data isolation across teams
    • SSO and identity federation (SAML, OIDC, OAuth2)
    • Centralized RBAC, two‑step verification, MFA
    • Audit logging and team management controls303132
  • For data access from pipelines and RAG, Dify uses API Key and OAuth for data source authorization, aligning with typical enterprise data‑ingestion patterns.33

From a security‑governance perspective, this lines up with standard practices: role‑based access, multi‑tenant isolation, strong authn/z and audit trails.3435

Compliance posture

Vendor‑supplied information makes clear that Dify.AI has obtained:

  • ISO 27001:2022 certification for its information security management system36
  • SOC 2 Type I and Type II reports
  • Statements of GDPR alignment and data‑privacy compliance37

These are nontrivial audits and put Dify alongside many mainstream SaaS/enterprise vendors in terms of baseline infosec assurance. Customers can download the relevant reports and certificates from the Dify UI (“Compliance” section) or via enterprise account reps.38

Compliance framework mapping

  • ISO 27001:2022 → global ISMS standard; good baseline for information security and controls.39
  • SOC 2 Type II → operational control design + effectiveness over time; especially relevant for US customers or those aligning to common SaaS norms.40

These do not automatically guarantee sector‑specific compliance (HIPAA, PCI DSS, etc.), but they are important building blocks.

Organization‑specific requirements note

The organization instructions for this workspace mention compliance requirements but currently list only a placeholder (“Hi”) and no recognizable standards. Given that, the only concrete, verifiable compliance posture we can evaluate is:

  • Dify does meet widely recognized security and compliance frameworks (ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type I/II, GDPR alignment) according to its official documentation and issue tracker.3741
  • If your organization later formalizes domain‑specific requirements (e.g., HIPAA, PCI DSS, local data‑sovereignty mandates), those would still need to be validated contractually and via DPA/BAA, but nothing currently indicates a hard miss.

Scalability & performance

Evidence of scalability includes:

  • Production case studies (e.g., Kakaku.com) where Dify Enterprise was deployed on GKE with Helm, scaling with demand and using an Admin API to automate workspace/user provisioning.42
  • Alibaba Cloud best‑practice articles on running Dify on ACK (Kubernetes) with high availability and elastic scaling.4344
  • Dify’s own performance notes on asynchronous workflow execution and engine optimizations.45

That said, user‑reported issues exist:

  • GitHub issues describing workflow nodes stuck in “Running” or long‑running executions that never return.46
  • Reports of needing to manage infrastructure carefully (DB connections, file storage, workspace management) when self‑hosting, which adds operational burden vs. pure SaaS.47

Self‑hosting vs. SaaS

Dify supports:

  • Cloud/SaaS via Dify’s managed offering or Dify Enterprise on Azure/AWS Marketplace.2948
  • Self‑hosting using Docker Compose (small) or Kubernetes (production); some guides highlight the extra overhead of managing infra, security patching, backups, and scaling—typical of any self‑hosted SaaS replacement.4950

Trade‑offs are standard:

  • SaaS → faster time to value, less operational burden, but more data‑residency and “shared responsibility” concerns.
  • Self‑host → more control and potential long‑term cost savings, but requires internal SRE/DevOps and security expertise.

See SaaS vs. self‑hosted Dify for enterprise AI.

Compliance alert for this organization

Given your environment’s “compliance requirements” section is effectively empty/invalid, we can only flag against standard external frameworks:

  • Dify’s documented certifications (ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Types I & II, GDPR) are strong positive signals.
  • There is no evidence from vendor docs that Dify is non‑compliant with any named standard, because no concrete standards were provided.

If in your internal governance model you later define a concrete list (e.g., “must be ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA available”), you would want to:

  • Obtain and review Dify’s SOC 2 and ISO reports
  • Confirm sector‑specific commitments (e.g., HIPAA, PCI DSS) in MSAs/DPAs
  • Ensure data residency/data‑processing locations meet your jurisdictional rules

At present, no specific compliance shortfalls can be asserted.

Strengths vs. Alternatives

This section looks at where users and reviewers see Dify as better or easier than LangChain, LangFlow, Flowise, and similar tools. For deeper comparison, see Dify vs. LangFlow vs. Flowise for government/regulated platforms.

1. End‑to‑end, unified platform

Compared to code‑first frameworks like LangChain or minimal visual builders, Dify offers:

  • Visual workflows
  • Built‑in RAG and knowledge management
  • Agent orchestration
  • Multi‑model gateway
  • Observability integrations
  • Plugin marketplace

all in one coherent UI. Reviews describe it as a “unified platform” that lets teams develop and integrate LLM apps with external data and workflows without stitching together many separate tools.512

For enterprises, this reduces integration sprawl and makes it easier to deploy Dify as an internal AI platform shared by multiple departments.

2. Visual builder and debugging

  • Multiple independent analyses conclude that Dify’s visual builder + debugger are among the best in this category.8
  • In a side‑by‑side comparison implementing a complex purchase‑order use case, reviewers reported that Dify offered the strongest debugging experience, including per‑node timings and IO inspection, which speeds up troubleshooting.8
  • By contrast, some tools (e.g., Flowise) are flagged as having weaker or minimal debugging UX.52

This matters directly for production readiness: when flows break, teams can actually see why.

3. Enterprise‑oriented features out of the box

Relative to some OSS tools that are mainly developer sandboxes, Dify has:

  • Multi‑workspace / multi‑tenant architecture
  • SSO (SAML, OIDC), RBAC, MFA
  • Audit logs and enterprise‑specific admin tooling
  • Compliance certifications and Azure/AWS marketplace listings

This shifts it closer to a product like an LLM PaaS than a “toy,” and several sources explicitly call out that Dify is “production‑ready from day one” and designed for enterprise use.[^baytech-production]

4. Rapid RAG + knowledge assistants

Multiple guides show that Dify can turn a corporate document set into a RAG knowledge assistant in minutes, including ingestion, vectorization, prompt routing, and deployment.5314

  • Visual controls for metadata filters and access policies make it easier for non‑ML engineers to manage contextual data.
  • The Knowledge Pipeline plugin ecosystem further strengthens use in complex enterprise knowledge environments.27

For organizations that primarily need “LLM over our docs + workflows,” this makes Dify a very attractive starting point.

5. Plugin marketplace and ecosystem

The Dify Plugin Marketplace provides:

  • Model providers (additional LLMs)
  • Data‑source connectors (cloud drives, DBs, CRM, etc.)
  • Agent strategies, RAG components, and workflow extensions
  • Bundles that deploy multiple plugins with one click5455

This is closer to an “app store” for AI plumbing than what most DIY frameworks offer, and is especially valuable for teams that don’t want to build integrations from scratch.

Weaknesses and Limitations

Despite its strengths, Dify is not a silver bullet. The literature and user reports highlight several limits.

1. Best for simple to moderately complex workflows

Analysts ranking enterprise agent platforms often position Dify as:

  • “Best for quick, low‑code prototyping and simple enterprise workflows,” while other tools (e.g., CrewAI, LangGraph, LangChain) are favored for deep multi‑agent orchestration and fine‑grained control.56

For very complex, stateful agent systems or vertical‑AI products requiring heavy custom logic, code‑first or more programmable frameworks may still be preferable.

2. Limited component set vs. highly extensible frameworks

  • Dify deliberately removed LangChain from its core and rebuilt around a smaller set of ~15 core components to reduce complexity and confusion.57
  • That simplicity has trade‑offs: users who want dozens of specialized building blocks (custom retrievers, vector DB features, exotic memory modules, etc.) may find Dify more constraining than LangChain or a raw Python stack.

Independent reviewers note that while Dify covers a wide range of common use cases, highly bespoke or research‑grade pipelines often push teams back toward code‑first frameworks.

3. Reliability and RAG quality issues in edge cases

Some real‑world friction points include:

  • Reports of workflow nodes occasionally stuck in “Running” state, requiring manual intervention or restarts.46
  • Articles on advanced customization explicitly motivated by “breaking Dify’s limitations” for complex enterprise applications, including complaints about insufficient retrieval relevance and lack of some specialized controls out of the box.21

These do not invalidate Dify as production‑capable, but they highlight that for mission‑critical systems, teams will likely need additional monitoring, error handling, and custom RAG tuning beyond “click‑to‑deploy.”

4. Integration and ops overhead when self‑hosting

  • Self‑hosting Dify requires orchestration of DBs, object storage, vector DBs, auth/SSO, and observability services; deployment guides emphasize the operational complexity.4758
  • As with any self‑hosted AI stack, organizations must manage:
    • Security patching and infra hardening
    • Backups, DR, capacity planning
    • Ongoing compliance (logs, audit trails, model governance)

For smaller teams without strong DevOps capacity, the managed Enterprise offering or a higher‑level SaaS might be safer.

5. Still evolving for very advanced agentic patterns

Some practitioners argue that Dify is optimized for single‑agent or lightly agentic use cases, and that more complex patterns (multi‑agent coordination, graph‑based reasoning, advanced memory architectures) may be better served by specialized frameworks and emerging stacks built around LangGraph, CrewAI, etc.5960

Dify’s roadmap (plugins, MCP, Knowledge Pipeline) is moving in that direction, but it is not the most experimental or research‑oriented platform.

Practical Fit: When Dify Makes Sense (and When It Doesn’t)

Good fit

Dify tends to be a strong candidate when:

  • You want a visual, collaborative environment where product, ops, and engineering can work together on LLM apps.
  • Your initial targets are RAG chatbots, internal assistants, or workflow‑style automation, especially across multiple departments.
  • You care about enterprise features (SSO, RBAC, audit logs, compliance certifications) but still want open‑source and self‑hosting options.
  • You want a plugin marketplace for connectors and tools instead of writing every integration yourself.

Less ideal fit

Other approaches may be better when:

  • You’re building research‑grade, heavily customized AI systems and are happy to live mostly in Python/TypeScript with LangChain, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, or bespoke code.
  • You need extreme control over every layer of retrieval, memory, agent planning, and evaluation, beyond what Dify’s component set exposes.
  • Your org has minimal DevOps capacity but extreme regulatory demands—where a fully managed, regulator‑vetted vertical solution might be safer.

For more nuanced decision guidance, see Choosing an AI agent/orchestration platform for your stack.

Summary

Dify is a mature, rapidly evolving open‑source platform that genuinely lowers the barrier to building production‑ready LLM applications, especially for RAG‑centric workflows and cross‑functional teams.

Evidence from case studies, third‑party reviews, and its certification posture supports many of its claims: it is viable for enterprise deployment, has solid security/compliance foundations (ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR), and offers one of the stronger visual/developer experiences in its category.

At the same time, it is not a universal replacement for code‑first frameworks or more specialized stacks. For highly complex, deeply customized, or extremely regulated workloads, you should expect to combine Dify with additional tooling—or select a different foundation entirely—especially around advanced RAG, agent orchestration, and long‑term observability/governance.

Overall, Dify belongs on the shortlist for organizations that:

  • Want to standardize on a central AI application platform
  • Value visual workflows + enterprise controls
  • Are comfortable supplementing it with custom RAG logic, external observability, and security tooling as their use cases grow in sophistication.

Footnotes

  1. Baytech Consulting, “What is Dify AI (2025)” – notes 130k+ cloud apps and ~34.8k GitHub stars as of mid‑2024. https://www.baytechconsulting.com/blog/what-is-dify-ai-2025 ↩

  2. Ibid. ↩ ↩2

  3. “Dify vs. n8n: Which platform should power your AI automation stack in 2025?” – notes microservices/Kubernetes deployment and production readiness. https://medium.com/generative-ai-revolution-ai-native-transformation/dify-vs-n8n-which-platform-should-power-your-ai-automation-stack-in-2025-e6d971f313a5 ↩

  4. Ibid. Describes Dify as “Figma for AI workflows.” ↩

  5. Baytech, overview of workflow builder. https://www.baytechconsulting.com/blog/what-is-dify-ai-2025 ↩

  6. Dify blog, “Dify AI Workflow”. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-ai-workflow ↩

  7. Dify blog, “Why a reliable visual agentic workflow matters”. https://dify.ai/blog/why-a-reliable-visual-agentic-workflow-matters ↩

  8. Argon & Co, “A review of low-code AI agents development platforms (Langflow, Flowise, Dify)” – ranks Dify highest for debugging UX. https://medium.com/iris-by-argon-co/a-review-of-low-code-ai-agents-development-platforms-f68e837af190 ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. Legacy Dify tools guide. https://legacy-docs.dify.ai/guides/tools ↩

  10. Skywork, “Dify.AI – Ultimate 2025 Guide”. https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/Dify.AI:-The-Ultimate-2025-Guide-to-Building-Production-Ready-AI-Applications/1974389253846265856 ↩

  11. Ibid., enterprise gateway use case. ↩

  12. Langfuse, “Dify integration”. https://langfuse.com/integrations/no-code/dify ↩

  13. Dify blog, “Dify integrates LangSmith & Langfuse”. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-integrates-langsmith-langfuse ↩

  14. Legacy Dify knowledge base docs. https://legacy-docs.dify.ai/guides/knowledge-base ↩ ↩2

  15. GitHub discussions on plugin‑based ingestion. https://github.com/langgenius/dify/discussions/25176 ↩

  16. Skywork guide describing advanced RAG engine. https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/Dify.AI-The-Ultimate-2025-Guide-to-Building-Production-Ready-AI-Applications/1974389253846265856 ↩

  17. Dify blog, “Conversation Variables / LLM memory”. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-conversation-variables-building-a-simplified-openai-memory ↩

  18. Dify blog, “RAG technology upgrade”. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-ai-rag-technology-upgrade-performance-improvement-qa-accuracy ↩

  19. Milvus blog, “Build RAG document assistant in 10 minutes with Dify and Milvus”. https://milvus.io/blog/hands-on-tutorial-build-rag-power-document-assistant-in-10-minutes-with-dify-and-milvus.md ↩

  20. Example YouTube demo of RAG on tabular assurance data. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFcsQFYURpg ↩

  21. “Breaking limitations: advanced customization guide for Dify platform”. https://dev.to/jamesli/breaking-limitations-advanced-customization-guide-for-dify-platform-25h4 ↩ ↩2

  22. Baytech, model support summary. https://www.baytechconsulting.com/blog/what-is-dify-ai-2025 ↩

  23. Dify blog, “Effortlessly leverage top open-source LLMs”. https://dify.ai/blog/effortlessly-leverage-top-opensource-llms ↩

  24. Tenten developer article on Dify’s model‑agnostic building blocks. https://developer.tenten.co/everything-you-need-to-know-about-difyai?source=more_articles_bottom_blogs ↩

  25. Ibid. ↩

  26. Dify blog, “Dify integrates Palo Alto Networks plugin for enhanced AI application security”. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-integrates-palo-alto-networks-plugin-for-enhanced-ai-application-security ↩

  27. Dify blog, “Introducing Knowledge Pipeline & plugin ecosystem”. https://dify.ai/blog/introducing-knowledge-pipeline ↩ ↩2

  28. Dify Enterprise page. https://dify.ai/enterprise ↩

  29. Microsoft Azure Marketplace listing for Dify Enterprise. https://marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/saas/sosgrouplimited.sos-dify-enterprise?tab=overview ↩ ↩2

  30. Dify blog on plugin system and multi‑workspace design. https://dify.ai/blog/dify-plugin-system-design-and-implementation ↩

  31. Legacy docs: workspace login/management. https://legacy-docs.dify.ai/guides/workspace ↩

  32. Legacy docs: team member management. https://legacy-docs.dify.ai/guides/management/team-members-management ↩

  33. Docs: data‑source authorization options. https://docs.dify.ai/en/guides/knowledge-base/knowledge-pipeline/authorize-data-source ↩

  34. TencentCloud, multi‑tenant AI agent data isolation strategies. https://www.tencentcloud.com/techpedia/126617 ↩

  35. FINOS AI governance framework on RBAC. https://air-governance-framework.finos.org/mitigations/mi-12_role-based-access-control-for-ai-data.html ↩

  36. Dify compliance docs; ISO 27001:2022 certificate. https://docs.dify.ai/en/policies/agreement/get-compliance-report ↩

  37. Same, noting SOC 2 Type I & II and GDPR. https://docs.dify.ai/en/policies/agreement/get-compliance-report ↩ ↩2

  38. Dify docs describing how to download compliance reports. https://docs.dify.ai/en/policies/agreement/get-compliance-report ↩

  39. ISO 27001 overview. https://www.beyondtrust.com/trust-center/industry-certifications ↩

  40. Comparison of ISO 27001 vs SOC 2. https://www.isms.online/iso-27001/certification/comparison-other-security-certifications/ ↩

  41. GitHub issue 19346 referencing SOC 1/2 and ISO 27001 standards. https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/19346 ↩

  42. Dify case study: Kakaku.com on Dify Enterprise with GKE/Helm and Admin API. https://dify.ai/blog/kakaku-accelerates-ai-adoption-with-dify-fast-secure-and-scalabl ↩

  43. Alibaba Cloud, “High availability and performance best practices for deploying Dify based on ACK”. https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/high-availability-and-performance-best-practices-for-deploying-dify-based-on-ack_601874 ↩

  44. Alibaba Cloud blog on AI gateway and availability. https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/dify-performance-bottleneck-higress-ai-gateway-injects-it-with-the-soul-of-high-availability_602527 ↩

  45. GitHub discussion on async workflow repos and performance. https://github.com/langgenius/dify/discussions/24621 ↩

  46. GitHub issue: nodes stuck in “Running”. https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/23179 ↩ ↩2

  47. Railway deploy template describing Dify infra requirements. https://railway.com/deploy/V1xiql ↩ ↩2

  48. AWS Marketplace listing for Dify Enterprise. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-vhluia2quhiuu ↩

  49. StarCompliance, “Pitfalls of self‑hosting”. https://www.starcompliance.com/the-pitfalls-of-self-hosting/ ↩

  50. ControlPlane blog on SaaS vs self‑hosted. https://controlplane.com/community-blog/post/saas-vs-self-hosted ↩

  51. Winder, comparison of open‑source LLM frameworks, describing Dify as a unified platform. https://winder.ai/comparison-open-source-llm-frameworks-pipelining/ ↩

  52. Lamatic AI review mentioning Flowise bugs/glitches and weaker debugging. https://blog.lamatic.ai/guides/flowise-ai/ ↩

  53. Dify vs n8n article highlighting rapid RAG knowledge assistant setup. https://medium.com/generative-ai-revolution-ai-native-transformation/dify-vs-n8n-which-platform-should-power-your-ai-automation-stack-in-2025-e6d971f313a5 ↩

  54. Dify plugin marketplace announcement. https://dify.ai/blog/introducing-dify-plugins ↩

  55. Same, describing plugin bundles and one‑click installation. https://dify.ai/blog/introducing-dify-plugins ↩

  56. Vellum AI, “Top 13 AI agent builder platforms for enterprises” – positions Dify as best for quick low‑code prototyping/simple workflows. https://www.vellum.ai/blog/top-13-ai-agent-builder-platforms-for-enterprises ↩

  57. Argon & Co review noting Dify’s ~15 components after removing LangChain. https://medium.com/iris-by-argon-co/a-review-of-low-code-ai-agents-development-platforms-f68e837af190 ↩

  58. Nucamp, “Setting up a self‑hosted AI startup infrastructure”. https://www.nucamp.co/blog/solo-ai-tech-entrepreneur-2025-setting-up-a-selfhosted-ai-startup-infrastructure-best-practices ↩

  59. Petri Tuomola’s analysis of Dify’s strengths/limitations for larger enterprise patterns. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/petrituomola_difyai-the-innovation-engine-for-generative-activity-7324263717674590208-3tGj ↩

  60. Anshuman Jha, “AI agent stack practical guide 2025”. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-agent-stack-finally-made-sense-practical-guide-2025-anshuman-jha-nfrgc ↩

Explore Further